[]
[]

Robinson Crusoe

Defoe, Daniel (Book - 2008 )
Average Rating: 3.5 stars out of 5.
Robinson Crusoe
Print

Item Details

Thomas Keymer is a 2011 Fellow of The Royal Society of Canada. 'I made him know his Name should be Friday, which was the Day I sav'd his Life...I likewise taught him to say Master' Robinson Crusoe's seafaring adventures are abruptly ended when he is shipwrecked, the solitary survivor on a deserted island. He gradually creates a life for himself, building a in English literature. land, and making a companion from the native whose life he saves. Daniel Defoe's enthralling story-telling and imaginatively detailed descriptions have ensured that his fiction masquerading as fact remains one of the most famous stories in English literature. On one level a simple adventure story, the novel also raises profound questions about moral and spiritual values, society, and man's abiding acquisitiveness. This new edition includes a scintillating Introduction and notes that illuminate the historical context.
Authors: Defoe, Daniel, 1661?-1731
Title: Robinson Crusoe
Publisher: Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, [2008], 2007
Edition: New ed
Characteristics: lii, 321 p. :,ill. ;,20 cm
Statement of Responsibility: Daniel Defoe ; edited with an introduction by Thomas Keymer and notes by Thomas Keymer and James Kelly
Additional Contributors: Kelly, James William
Keymer, Tom
ISBN: 0199553971
9780199553976
Branch Call Number: FICTION DEFOE 2008
Bibliography: Includes bibliographical references (p. [xlii]-xlvi)
Subject Headings: Islands Fiction Castaways Fiction Shipwreck survival Fiction Crusoe, Robinson (Fictitious character) Fiction
Genre/Form: Robinsonades
Adventure fiction
Topical Term: Islands
Castaways
Shipwreck survival
Crusoe, Robinson (Fictitious character)
LCCN: 2006026022
MARC Display»

Opinion

From Library Staff

The diary of an Englishman shipwrecked for almost thirty years on a deserted island.

Shipwreaked on a deserted island, Robinson Crusoe has to learn how to stay alive in a dangerous land. He must hunt, build shelter, and make his island home. He is all alone, until one day he sees a footprint in the sand.


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

Jul 11, 2014
  • katherinekar rated this: 4.5 stars out of 5.

I love this book. The only thing I don't like is on the version I was reading did not have chapters.

Apr 15, 2014
  • lisahiggs rated this: 4.5 stars out of 5.

Robinson Crusoe is the firsthand account of the sole survivor of a shipwreck who is stranded on a desert island for almost thirty years. The simple and compelling adventure narrative is full of all the cool survival tricks you can learn to do on your own when you’ve got thirty years time on your hands. Beyond the adventure narrative, and the weird capitalizing of every Noun, there is also a consistently piercing self-analysis by Crusoe, as he examines the choices that brought him to be shipwrecked and spends thirty years making himself into a better man.

Robinson Crusoe has a wickedly black sense of humour, too, and a self-awareness that might be the very thing that makes this book literature. Crusoe is painfully self-aware of himself and every single choice he made in life that led him to be shipwrecked – he has thirty years to spend learning about himself, judging himself, pondering religion and the world, and getting his story down on paper. That Daniel Defoe could create a character that is so vivid and aware that people thought this was a true story, and that he did this in 1719 while inventing the novel, blows my mind. What have we been doing for the last 300 years that we can't write as well as this now or debate religion as eloquently?

Of course, even in the most enduring and classic literature, there are bound to be parts that don’t age well, such as Robinson Crusoe’s initial thought upon seeing other people for the first time in 24 years is that now he can get himself a black servant.

Aug 15, 2013
  • lmcshane rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

I enjoyed the beginning of the book - but did find that it got a bit redundant and too preachy in parts -and by the end -very dull and strange w/Friday killing a bear in France. I can see why it was interesting at the time written -and it is worth the read for the anthropology revealed and geography. Also, forward by Avi - makes insightful commentary.

Jun 19, 2013
  • kleokleopatra66 rated this: 4 stars out of 5.

a very good book, the only trouble i had was getting past the rather stealthy old english language and grammar it is written in but one gets used to it. some words i stumbled over, i read it in german the first time so i did not have that problem . i think it depicts the human spirit and it potential for survival in all kinds of adverse conditions to the fullest. the ingenuity with which crusoe makes a life on this island is admirable. the claim of some reviews that the book is racist i find not to be true. the book was not written in 1999 but rather in the late 1600's. so slavery was rampant then in america as well as in the rest of the world and the book simply reflects the spirit of the times, the way people back then thought, rather than considering it racist it should be considered a great lesson in history whether we agree with it today or not~ that is how things were back then and this book depicts it honestly.

Apr 17, 2013
  • kyivuk04 rated this: 4 stars out of 5.

I liked this book. It can get a little dry at times, but overall I enjoyed it. I don't know why some people thought it was racist; I didn't get that impression at all.

Jan 21, 2012
  • haywardfamily rated this: 3.5 stars out of 5.

Enjoyed it.

Oct 01, 2011
  • vcc rated this: 2.5 stars out of 5.

This fictionalized story of Alexander Selkirk's adventures as a castaway has some interesting points to it, but because most of the novel details Crusoe's life outside of the deserted isle, the story seems drawn out. It was a popular novel of its' time, but the continual writings of Crusoe's feeling of his English superiority versus the "savage" or "un-Christian" behaviour of others is extremely pompous to read.

Apr 08, 2010
  • kingshearte rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

I found this book exceptionally dull, full of offensive racial stereotypes (yes, I know that these ideas were standard at the time, but that doesn't make them any less abhorrent), and just generally extremely difficult to slog through. It may be a classic, but I just don't think it was worth it.

Age

Add Age Suitability

xinyiliu thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 99 and 99

jacooomy thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 99 and 98

yellow_hippo_44 thinks this title is suitable for 5 years and over

karahclover thinks this title is suitable for 67 years and over

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

Apr 15, 2014
  • lisahiggs rated this: 4.5 stars out of 5.

I observ’d, that the two who swam [in pursuit], were yet more than twice as long swimming over the Creek, as the [Savage] was that fled from them: It came now very warmly upon my Thoughts, and indeed irresistibly, that now was my Time to get me a Servant, or Assistant; and that I was call’d plainly by Providence to save this poor Creature’s Life.

Apr 15, 2014
  • lisahiggs rated this: 4.5 stars out of 5.

For me to think of such a Voyage was the most preposterous thing that ever Man in such Circumstances could be guilty of. But I, that was born to be my own Destroyer, could no more resist the Offer than I could restrain my first rambling Designs, when my Father’s good Counsel was lost upon me. [And so] I went on board in an evil Hour, the first of September, 1659, being the same Day eight Years [ago] that I went from my Father and Mother’s, in order to act the Rebel to their Authority, and the Fool to my own Interest.

Videos

Add a Video

There are no videos for this title yet.

Find it at MCL

  Loading...

Powered by BiblioCommons.
app10 Version sidamo (sidamo) Last updated 2014/09/15 11:31