[]
[]

Death Comes to Pemberley

James, P. D.

(Book - 2011)
Average Rating: 3 stars out of 5.
Death Comes to Pemberley
 Add a Comment  Add Tags
Print
Pemberley is thrown into chaos after Elizabeth Bennett's disgraced sister Lydia arrives and announces that her husband Wickham has been murdered.
Publisher: New York : Alfred A. Knopf, 2011
Edition: 1st U.S. ed
ISBN: 0307959856
9780307959850
Branch Call Number: MYSTERY JAMES 2011
Characteristics: 291 p. ;,25 cm
Additional Contributors: Austen, Jane (Pride and prejudice) 1775-1817

Opinion

From Library Staff

Pemberley is thrown into chaos after Elizabeth Bennett's disgraced sister Lydia arrives and announces that her husband Wickham has been murdered.


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

Oct 21, 2014
  • rab1953 rated this: 2 stars out of 5.

Boring. Oddly enough, I was half way through this before I realized that I had read it before. It didn’t engage me the first time, and it still does not. I didn’t find the wit and social satire from Jane Austin, although James adopts a writing style and voice that mimic Austin’s. And nor did I find the gripping murder mystery that I expected from James. The style feels forced and the mystery seems contrived.
Okay, James shows that in the genteel social setting of the propertied classes of the nineteenth century, even the idea of being associated with a mystery was (as she would say) abhorrent. As a woman, Elizabeth must keep away from anything suggesting scandal, so much of the story has to be seen from Darcy’s point of view. And he is such a self-restrained and self-regarding individual that he focuses more on how the murder might affect his own family than on the perpetrator or the victim. This is a perspective that is difficult to relate to, and pushes the hints of social consciousness about the situation of the property-less and of women far to the background.
Perhaps the most interesting character, for example, is Mrs. Younge, who succeeds against all odds in creating for herself a degree of security and wealth by taking advantage of the social strictures imposed on wealthy society, but we see her only in glimpses through the eyes of observers who hate her. James hints at the costs that this imposed on her, but from the limited perspective she has chosen, she cannot give Mrs. Younge any depth or colour.
One of the few bits that had a sense of reality was the examination conducted by the nineteenth century medical men, and it was interesting to imagine what they actually knew and understood with limited forensic tools. Similarly, the inquiry and court procedures were interesting in illustrating the legal forms of the time. (Although it’s difficult to see how the entire examination, cross-examination, judgement and sentencing could have taken place in what appears to be one day, but I leave that to James’ actual legal knowledge and her authorial license.)
So who is the book written for? James apparently enjoyed the idea of writing in the voice of one of her (and her readers’) favourite writers. But instead of the sharp observations of Jane Austin, we get a look at the ongoing relationship of a romanticized couple, which reveals little except that they get along well, care for their children, and live up to the social expectations of their time and class. The tragedy is that Elizabeth’s vulgar sister and her husband might upset their quiet life and the marriage prospects of Darcy’s younger sister (although there’s no real danger of that either, since she is being courted by a young man who would be happy to marry her regardless of the potential scandal). Perhaps Austin could have made me care about the upset to the social equilibrium, but James does not.

Sep 05, 2014
  • Another_Opinion rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

Wow! Some people actually liked this book! I thought it was dull and plodding, slow and wordy. This is not a mystery, there are no clues that could allow you to solve the case as you go along. Odd behavior by Colonel FitzWilliam is explained late but has no real relation to the plot, only to a poorly developed sub-plot.

I don't recommend this at all.

May 27, 2014
  • Rock_Shadow rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

Another fun murder mystery by P.D. James. I expected a good crime novel, and the book delivered. It helped to have read Jane Austen to know who was who, and not to expect a sequel.

Nov 12, 2013
  • falconroom rated this: 1.5 stars out of 5.

Whle i've enjoyed Austen and p & p in the past, it was so long ago, like the previous commenter said, I was "mystified" and--ultimately--bored to death. It was a staff pick, which i usually enjoy (I find some gems!), i sent this one back unread; that is extremely unusual for me.

Aug 29, 2013
  • azor rated this: 2.5 stars out of 5.

If you haven't read Jane Austen you will be completely mystified by this! Interesting experiment and fun for Austen fans to read. But nothing more.

Jul 22, 2013
  • tuesdayswithlori rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

The mimicry of Jane Austin was very good. The plot...not so much. It was a bit obvious, actually and while I thought some of the loose threads from Pride and Prejudice were cleverly wrapped up, it was not a real revelation. I also thought the voice of Elizabeth was a bit too anxious almost right from the start and the voice of Darcy was at times too effusive. It was an interesting take on how the Darcy's would have grown and the ultimate ending was not unforseen and was satisfactory, but not stupendous.

Jul 11, 2013
  • judybrowni rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

I was willing to give this a try, but after James arbitrarily assigned a new personality (and not a particularly good one) to a character, she lost me.

Not reason given why this character may have suddenly begun to act in ways completely opposite to his Austen personality, he just does.

Couldn't suspend my disbelief further.

Jun 21, 2013
  • Haley_B rated this: 4 stars out of 5.

I was excited to read this book in preparation for BBC One's adaptation of it. P&P is one of my favorite reads and I looked forward to this book.

It was a good story, but somehow I didn't find P.D. James' portrayal of Mr. Darcy to ring true to Austen's. He seemed unsure of himself sometimes, and allowed his cousin to take control far too easily. Elizabeth's dialogue was nothing like Austen's.

The mystery was interesting to me. I enjoyed watching it unfold, but it just seemed to end in a hurry.

Although this was an interesting read to me, simply writing using Regency language and turns of phrase does not a Jane Austen book make. If you can read this as an interesting story and not as a sequel to P&P you might enjoy it more.

May 24, 2013
  • ser_library rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

predictable plot which violates the Knox rules for mysteries

not well written

reminds me of Dr Johnson's comments of women preachers

Jan 06, 2013
  • mehitabel33 rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

A rather mildly entertaining mystery from PD James, who handles Austen's characters with silver tongs: the result is so reverential that it never really comes to life. A shame, because the premise is a promising one.

View All Comments

Videos

Add a Video

P.D. James on her 90th birthday

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Find it at MCL

  Loading...

Powered by BiblioCommons.
app08 Version eventuell-fix Last updated 2014/11/25 13:07